Explaining Stonewall’s Rating
By Bruce Felps
Wondering why Stonewall Jackson Elementary School slipped two notches on the state’s school rating measure?
This week’s edition of the school’s PTA newsletter contains a message from Principal Olivia Henderson to parents of students.
If you’re curious:
Dear Stonewall Parents,
As many of you know, last week the Texas Education Agency (TEA) released their state accountability ratings, and Stonewall’s rating dropped two levels from “exemplary” to “acceptable.” This drop in our rating was not unexpected. The purpose of this letter is to briefly explain the change in the state’s school accountability system and the effect it had on our school.
According to the TEA’s testing program, 2011 was the year that all students would be tested on grade level and that all student test scores would count. This included our small group of Deaf Education students who have previously taken a modified version of the TAKS test. This is the first year that the state has aggregated their scores with the general education population.
As background, data is gathered and aggregated for each student who takes the TAKS test. Each data point is categorized and considered as a separate student population. These categories are ethnicity, economic status, whether or not a student is in special education, language, and gender. All of our students typically fall under two or more populations. The accountability ratings depend on how each student population scores, not just the school’s overall scores. Also, prior to this year, each student group must also have at least 30 students for that population to be counted in the rating.
At Stonewall, a few things contributed to the decline in our rating:
Counting all student TAKS scores — Historically, not all of our student populations were counted toward our overall rating, specifically Deaf Education, given this population was smaller in size. This student population has grown over time. That, coupled with the TEA’s requirement to count all TAKS scores for all students, impacted our rating.
Modified TAKS test — Our Deaf Education students currently take a modified or accommodated TAKS test per the requirement that all students must participate in TAKS testing. This is not unusual. However, the challenge is that many of these students have learning differences that are beyond just being hearing impaired, placing them two to three years behind their mainstream peers. Yet, they are expected to meet the academic expectations at their grade level on a standardized test.
I have been working with our Site-Based-Decision-Making (SBDM) committee as well as with our Representative Dan Branch, chairman of the legislature’s education committee, to express our concerns regarding the TAKS testing of our deaf students. I believe that it would better serve those students to be tested in a way that would measure growth rather than a pass or fail examination. We take these issues seriously and have been actively addressing them.
Stonewall’s overall performance remains at a high level. Our reading and math scores continue to be much higher than the district’s scores and are on par with many other schools in the state. Student TAKS commended rate continues to grow and is among the highest in Dallas ISD. The Deaf Education program is one of our best assets; it makes Stonewall unique among the district’s elementary schools, and the exposure to Deaf culture helps our children to one day become understanding and tolerant adults.
As a school, we will continue to strive to provide a quality education for all of our students. And, we will continue to work through the district and our elected representatives to voice our concern to create an equitable testing program.
Thank you for your continued support, and please don’t hesitate to call me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Olivia Henderson, Principal
Stonewall Jackson Elementary
-
1
Pingback on Aug 15th, 2011 at 4:12 pm
[...] that the district campaigned heavily for and is now also being counted. You can also click here to check out a letter from Stonewall’s principal, Olivia Henderson, which sheds some light on [...]
-
2
Pingback on Oct 5th, 2011 at 8:06 am
[...] assertion that Stonewall remains an exemplary school despite the state’s findings. TEA, she explained in a letter to parents originally published in the Stonewall PTA newsletter, said the agency simply changed its rating [...]










August 9, 2011 at 5:01 pm
Thank you for the insightful article. As a parent of a former student of Stonewall Jackson Elementary, I can understand the reduced rating better with this explanation from the principal. No other elementary has the deaf education program that Stonewall Jackson Elementary has. And it has always been a source of pride because all of the students’ chance to learn sign language and/or be in a sign language choir (when my daughter was there). Our daughter also learned to spell by first signing all of the letters to a given word with one hand and then with the other, so it helped her with her spelling because it provided another sensory learning experience. My wife, Alice Ann, and I have fond memories of our daughter’s experience at Stonewall Jackson Elementary due to the unique opportunity we had to understand life from a different perspective through the deaf community. It is also troubling to learn that the deaf education children may play some part in reducing the rankings of the school because of additional learning disabilities. I anticipate that those considerations will find acknowledgement as the principal works with our legislators and others in charge of the testing levels which determine school rankings. Truly, one test does not fit all, even among the deaf.
August 11, 2011 at 9:42 am
Same thing happened to Woodrow because of their Deaf Education Students being counted towards the Accountability Ratings.
August 11, 2011 at 3:17 pm
And to J.L. Long…
August 12, 2011 at 11:00 am
All school testing is political. This is not generally understood by the public.
Most parents instinctively think tests are technical and objective in nature. That’s true up to a point. But once you have gathered fair and objectve test scores for each student you can manipulate them this way and that by the way you aggregate and process those scores.
The rules used for aggregating and processing the scores are very complex. And they are heavily influenced by the actions of the Texas Legislature.
The last Texas Legislature put pressure on the Commissioner of Education to change the way the individual student scores are aggregated and processed. As a result many hundreds of Texas schools are getting lower ratings this year. Stonewall Jackson Elementary just happens to be one of them.
(Here’s a link to the April 2011 statement of Commissioner of Education Final Decisions: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2011/standardfinal.pdf . Notice the reference to “the unanimous vote against the use of test score projections during recent floor debate of the Texas House of Representatives on House Bill 500.”)
I have every confidence Stonewall Jackson Elementary is doing the same fine job of educating its students that it has done in the past.